Carlson v. Sam's West, Inc., 2:17-cv-02882-MMD-GWF. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190429856
Visitors: 26
Filed: Apr. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER FIRST REQUEST GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff DONNA CARLSON ("Plaintiff") and Defendants SAM'S WEST, INC. and SAM'S REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST ("Defendants") by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate for an extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant Sam's West, Inc's Second Motion for Protective Order Precluding Inappropriate Ar
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER FIRST REQUEST GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff DONNA CARLSON ("Plaintiff") and Defendants SAM'S WEST, INC. and SAM'S REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST ("Defendants") by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate for an extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant Sam's West, Inc's Second Motion for Protective Order Precluding Inappropriate Are..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
FIRST REQUEST
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff DONNA CARLSON ("Plaintiff") and Defendants SAM'S WEST, INC. and SAM'S REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST ("Defendants") by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate for an extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant Sam's West, Inc's Second Motion for Protective Order Precluding Inappropriate Areas of Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6) Examination (Document No. 93) ("MPO")), up to and including April 26, 2019.
Pursuant to Local Rule 2.25, the parties hereby aver that this is the first request for such extension of time to respond to the MPO.
The parties aver, pursuant to Local Rule 2.25, that good cause exists for the requested extension.
The parties aver that this request for extension of time to respond to the MPO is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
