Filed: May 02, 2019
Latest Update: May 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER UPON REVIEW OF REDACTED PRODUCTION BY LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Centex Homes v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, et al., case number 2:17-cv-02407-JAD-VCF. Centex timely submitted to chambers for in camera review documents identified in the attached "Privilege Log Updates 11/28/18." The first five items on the log all reference the same bates number, LEX 0344. This is because there were five separate redactions
Summary: ORDER UPON REVIEW OF REDACTED PRODUCTION BY LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Centex Homes v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, et al., case number 2:17-cv-02407-JAD-VCF. Centex timely submitted to chambers for in camera review documents identified in the attached "Privilege Log Updates 11/28/18." The first five items on the log all reference the same bates number, LEX 0344. This is because there were five separate redactions o..
More
ORDER UPON REVIEW OF REDACTED PRODUCTION BY LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Centex Homes v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, et al., case number 2:17-cv-02407-JAD-VCF.
Centex timely submitted to chambers for in camera review documents identified in the attached "Privilege Log Updates 11/28/18." The first five items on the log all reference the same bates number, LEX 0344. This is because there were five separate redactions on the same page produced by Lexington. The court has appended numbers (1) through (5) to the log for ease of reference in this order.
In a cover letter for the delivery of these documents, counsel for Lexington stated that it has agreed to disclose as unredacted LEX 0344(5) and LEX 0346. After reviewing the entire in camera submission, the court finds that the redacted information designated LEX (1-4) is not relevant to any claim or defense and need not be produced in an unredacted form. Similarly, the premium information redacted from the documents beginning with LEX 0712 through the end of the attached privilege log is irrelevant to any claim or defense and need not be produced.
The court finds that information redacted from the following documents is relevant to a claim or defense and are not privileged: LEX 0344(5), LEX 0345, LEX 0346, LEX 0567-0568, LEX 0568-0570, LEX 0571, LEX 0572 and LEX 0574-0583.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before May 9, 2019, Lexington must deliver to Centex unredacted copies of LEX 0344(5), LEX 0345, LEX 0346, LEX 0567-0568, LEX 0568-0570, LEX 0571, LEX 0572 and LEX 0574-0583.
Centex Homes v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., et al. (Kachnik)
U.S. District Court Case No. 2:17-CV-02407-JAD-VCF
Lexington's Privilege Log Updated 11/28/18
DATE BATES NUMBERS DOCUMENT FROM TO PRIVILEGE/BASIS
LEX 0344(1) Claim notes regarding Not relevant and not reasonably
reserves calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence. Confidential and
proprietary business information and
trade secrets.
LEX 0344(2) Claim note pertaining to Not relevant and not reasonably
communication with calculated to lead to the discovery of
counsel admissible evidence. Confidential
communication protected by the
attorney-client privilege and/or the
attorney work-product doctrine.
LEX 0344(3) Claim note pertaining to Not relevant and not reasonably
communication with calculated to lead to the discovery of
counsel admissible evidence. Confidential
communication protected by the
attorney-client privilege and/or the
attorney work-product doctrine.
LEX 0344(4) Claim notes regarding Not relevant and not reasonably
reserves calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence. Confidential and
proprietary business information and
trade secrets.
LEX 0344(5) Claim note pertaining to Third-party privacy. Not relevant and
named insured claim not reasonably calculated to lead to the
handling-related discovery of admissible evidence.
information Confidential and proprietary business
information and trade secrets.
LEX 0345 Claim note regarding Third-party privacy and attorney-client
named insured tender privileged. Not relevant and not
reasonably calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible evidence.
LEX 0346 Claim note pertaining to Third-party privacy. Not relevant and
the named insured and not reasonably calculated to lead to the
applicable claim handling discovery of admissible evidence.
Confidential and proprietary business
information and trade secrets.
10/1/14 LEX 0567-0568 Letter from Desert James Murphy Rebecca Fowler Third-party privacy. Confidential
Plastering's Counsel to communication protected by the
Lexington attorney-client privilege and/or the
attorney work-product doctrine.
10/2/14 LEX 0569-0570 Letter from Desert James Murphy Rebecca Fowler Third-party privacy. Confidential
Plastering's Counsel to communication protected by the
Lexington attorney-client privilege and/or the
attorney work-product doctrine.
10/3/14 LEX 0571 Letter from Desert James Murphy Rebecca Fowler Third-party privacy. Confidential
Plastering's Counsel to communication protected by the
Lexington attorney-client privilege and/or the
attorney work-product doctrine.
11/3/14 LEX 0572 Letter from Desert James Murphy Rebecca Fowler Third-party privacy. Confidential
Plastering's Counsel to communication protected by the
Lexington attorney-client privilege and/or the
attorney work-product doctrine.
09/02/15 LEX 0574-0583 Letter to Lexington from Laura Boezeman-Farias Lexington Third-party privacy. Confidential
Desert Plastering's communication protected by the
Counsel to Lexington attorney-client privilege and/or the
attorney work-product doctrine.
LEX 0712 Premium Information Third-party privacy. Confidential and
proprietary business information and
trade secrets. Not relevant or reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence
LEX 0716 Premium Information Third-party privacy. Confidential and
proprietary business information and
trade secrets. Not relevant or reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence
LEX 0754 Premium Information Third-party privacy. Confidential and
proprietary business information and
trade secrets. Not relevant or reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence
LEX 0764 Premium Information Third-party privacy. Confidential and
proprietary business information and
trade secrets. Not relevant or reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence
LEX 0771 Premium Information Third-party privacy. Confidential and
proprietary business information and
trade secrets. Not relevant or reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence
LEX 0773 Premium Information Third-party privacy. Confidential and
proprietary business information and
trade secrets. Not relevant or reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence
LEX 0803 Premium Information Third-party privacy. Confidential and
proprietary business information and
trade secrets. Not relevant or reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence
LEX 0806 Premium Information Third-party privacy. Confidential and
proprietary business information and
trade secrets. Not relevant or reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence
LEX 0823 Premium Information Third-party privacy. Confidential and
proprietary business information and
trade secrets. Not relevant or reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence
LEX 0825 Premium Information Third-party privacy. Confidential and
proprietary business information and
trade secrets. Not relevant or reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence
LEX 0876-0878 Premium Information Third-party privacy. Confidential and
proprietary business information and
trade secrets. Not relevant or reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence
LEX 0880-0881 Premium Information Third-party privacy. Confidential and
proprietary business information and
trade secrets. Not relevant or reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence
