Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Woodward v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, 2:19-cv-00019-APG-CWH. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190506625 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO EXPERIAN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [FIRST REQUEST] CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Stephanie Woodward ("Plaintiff"), by and through her counsel of record, and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ("Experian") have agreed and stipulated to the following: 1. On April 15, 2019, Experian filed a Motion for Protective Order [ECF Dkt. 49]. 2. Plaintiff's Response is due April 29, 2019. 3. Plaintiff a
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO EXPERIAN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

[FIRST REQUEST]

Plaintiff Stephanie Woodward ("Plaintiff"), by and through her counsel of record, and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ("Experian") have agreed and stipulated to the following:

1. On April 15, 2019, Experian filed a Motion for Protective Order [ECF Dkt. 49].

2. Plaintiff's Response is due April 29, 2019.

3. Plaintiff and Experian have agreed to extend Plaintiff's response seven days in order to allow Plaintiff's counsel to contact the clients to address Experian's pending motion for protective order and obtain approval to file the response. As a result, both Plaintiff and Experian hereby request this Court to further extend the date for Plaintiff to respond to Experian's Motion for Protective Order until May 6, 2019. This stipulation is made in good faith, is not interposed for delay, and is not filed for an improper purpose.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO EXPERIAN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer