Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Steinmetz v. American Honda Finance, 2:19-cv-00067-APG-GWF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190507b35 Visitors: 1
Filed: May 06, 2019
Latest Update: May 06, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR CHAE BANK USA, N.A. (incorrectly names as Chase Card) TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Second Request) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Chase Bank USA, N.A.'s (incorrectly named as "Chase Card") ("Chase") response to Plaintiff Jacqueline Steinmetz's ("Plaintiff") first amended complaint is currently due May 3, 2019. Chase and Plaintiff agree that Chase has up to and including May 10, 2019 to respond to Plaintiff's complaint,
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR CHAE BANK USA, N.A. (incorrectly names as Chase Card) TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

(Second Request)

Chase Bank USA, N.A.'s (incorrectly named as "Chase Card") ("Chase") response to Plaintiff Jacqueline Steinmetz's ("Plaintiff") first amended complaint is currently due May 3, 2019. Chase and Plaintiff agree that Chase has up to and including May 10, 2019 to respond to Plaintiff's complaint, to provide time for the parties to continue to investigate Plaintiff's allegations and discuss potential resolution and, if needed, for Chase to prepare a response.

This is the second request for an extension, and it is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer