BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL I, LLC, 2:15-cv-01078-APG-BNW. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190508e47
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 07, 2019
Latest Update: May 07, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTIONS (ECF NO. 97 and 99). [FIRST REQUEST] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, The Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2005-4, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-4 ("BONY"); Defendant/Counter-Claimant, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("S
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTIONS (ECF NO. 97 and 99). [FIRST REQUEST] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, The Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2005-4, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-4 ("BONY"); Defendant/Counter-Claimant, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SF..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTIONS (ECF NO. 97 and 99).
[FIRST REQUEST]
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, The Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2005-4, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-4 ("BONY"); Defendant/Counter-Claimant, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"); and Defendant, Pecos Park-Sunflower Homeowners' Association ("HOA"), by and through their respective undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for BONY to file its responses to HOA's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 97] and to SFR's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 99] until May 22, 2019. BONY's responses to both Motions are currently due on May 8, 2019. BONY requests the extension to allow sufficient time to fully respond to the arguments made in the Motions.
This is the parties' first request for an extension of time and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
