Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Steinmetz v. American Honda Finance, 2:19-cv-00067-APG-GWF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190509c93 Visitors: 22
Filed: May 08, 2019
Latest Update: May 08, 2019
Summary: JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT [SECOND REQUEST] ORDER ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Plaintiff Jacqueline Steinmetz ("Plaintiff") and Defendant American Honda Finance ("AHF") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby move jointly to extend Plaintiff's deadline to file a Response to AHF's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (14) fourteen days: 1. On January 10, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a Co
More

JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

[SECOND REQUEST]

ORDER

Plaintiff Jacqueline Steinmetz ("Plaintiff") and Defendant American Honda Finance ("AHF") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby move jointly to extend Plaintiff's deadline to file a Response to AHF's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (14) fourteen days:

1. On January 10, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint [ECF Dkt. 1].

2. On February 25, 2019, Experian filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [ECF Dkt.14].

3. On March 11, 2019, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 28].

4. On April 3, 2019 AHF filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 47].

5. On April 15, 2019, the Parties stipulated to extend Plaintiff's deadline to respond to AHF's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint to May 8, 2019 [ECF Dkt. 54].

6. Plaintiff and AHF have agreed to extend Plaintiff's response fourteen days in order to allow Plaintiff to further consider the issues in AHF's motion, as well as to continue exploration of the resolution of this case. As a result, both Plaintiff and AHF hereby request this Court to further extend the date for Plaintiff to respond to AHF's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint until May 22, 2019. This stipulation is made in good faith, is not interposed for delay, and is not filed for an improper purpose.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated May 7, 2019. KNEPPER & CLARK LLC WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP /s/ Miles N. Clark /s/ Chad C. Butterfield Matthew I. Knepper, Esq. Chad C. Butterfield, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12796 Nevada Bar No. 10532 Miles N. Clark, Esq. 300 South Fourth St., 11th Floor Nevada Bar No. 13848 Las Vegas, NV 89101 10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109 Email: chad.butterfield@wilsonelser.com Las Vegas, NV 89129 Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com Counsel for Defendant Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com American Honda Finance HAINES & KRIEGER LLC David H. Krieger, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9086 8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com Counsel for Plaintiff
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer