Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Mitchell Chiropractic, Ltd., 2:18-cv-02406-APG-NJK. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190514691 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 08, 2019
Latest Update: May 08, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF A DISCOVERY PLAN AND STAY OF DISCOVERY (SECOND REQUEST) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants Mitchell Chiropractic, LTD d/b/a Meadows Chiropractic, Andrew Mitchell, D.C., and Jason Chong, D.C. (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate and a
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF A DISCOVERY PLAN AND STAY OF DISCOVERY (SECOND REQUEST)

Plaintiffs State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants Mitchell Chiropractic, LTD d/b/a Meadows Chiropractic, Andrew Mitchell, D.C., and Jason Chong, D.C. (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. To facilitate the Parties' agreement to participate in an early mediation to attempt to resolve this dispute, this Court previously entered an order extending the deadline for the Parties to submit a Discovery Plan to May 15, 2019, and staying discovery until after the submission of a Discovery Plan.

2. On April 11, 2019, the Parties participated in a mediation. At this mediation, the Parties reached a confidential settlement in principal. The parties are now in the process of preparing and finalizing a settlement agreement.

3. For judicial economy and to facilitate the Parties' ability to finalize their settlement agreement, the Parties have agreed to stay all deadlines and discovery for an additional 60 days. Because the Parties have reached an agreement in principal, it is not expected that submission of a Discovery Plan will ultimately be necessary, and this case will be dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the deadline for the submission of a proposed discovery plan pursuant to FRCP 26(f)(3) will be continued 60 days so that the Parties can finalize their settlement agreement, which is anticipated to occur within 60 days or sooner.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Parties agree to stay all discovery until the submission of a Discovery Plan.

Dated this 7th day of May 2019 Dated this 7th day of May 2019 KOLESAR & LATHAM ATKIN WINNER & SHERROD By: __________________ By: /s/ Bruce W. Kelley Jonathan D. Blam, Esq. Bruce W. Kelley Nevada Bar No. 009515 Nevada Bar No. 7331 Mattew T. Dushoff, Esq. Justin J. Zarcone Navada Bar No. 004875 Nevada Bar No. 8735 400 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 1117 South Rancho Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Andrew P. Baratta, Esq. (Pa. Bar No. 82250) BROWN & JAMES, P.C Pro Hac Vice Pending By: /s/Timothy J. Wolf Baratta, Russell & Baratta Timothy J. Wolf 3500 Reading Way Missouri Bar No. 53099 Huntingdon Valley, Pa. 19006 Benjamin S. McIntosh Missouri Bar No. 68248 800 Market Street, Suite 1100 Attorneys for Defendants. St. Louis, Missouri 63101-2501 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer