Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Brown v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-01643-JAD-BNW. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190520906 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 17, 2019
Latest Update: May 17, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION BRENDA WEKSLER , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Remand be extended until June 20, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defense counsel requires additional time to consider the certified administrative record, Plaintiff's motion, and the governme
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Remand be extended until June 20, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defense counsel requires additional time to consider the certified administrative record, Plaintiff's motion, and the government's position. Defense Counsel also needs time to allow for planned leave. Plaintiff's counsel does not object and agrees that all subsequent deadlines should be accordingly extended.

Respectfully submitted, Date: May 15, 2019 By: /s/Cyrus Safa* CYRUS SAFA Attorney for Plaintiff (*By e-mail authorization on 05/15/19) Dated: May 15, 2019 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration /s/Donna W. Anderson DONNA W. ANDERSON Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer