Haney-Williams v. GlaxoSmithkline LLC, 2:17-CV-2900 JCM (GWF). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190529f79
Visitors: 30
Filed: May 28, 2019
Latest Update: May 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is the matter of Haney-Williams v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al., case number 2:17-cv-02900-JCM-GWF. On May 20, 2019, petitioner Arthur Liederman filed a petition for permission to practice pro hac vice. (ECF No. 61). The verified petition appoints two resident members of the bar of this court as co-council. Id. However, the local rules require a petitioner to appoint only one resident member as co-council. LR IA 11-2(d)
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is the matter of Haney-Williams v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al., case number 2:17-cv-02900-JCM-GWF. On May 20, 2019, petitioner Arthur Liederman filed a petition for permission to practice pro hac vice. (ECF No. 61). The verified petition appoints two resident members of the bar of this court as co-council. Id. However, the local rules require a petitioner to appoint only one resident member as co-council. LR IA 11-2(d)...
More
ORDER
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is the matter of Haney-Williams v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al., case number 2:17-cv-02900-JCM-GWF.
On May 20, 2019, petitioner Arthur Liederman filed a petition for permission to practice pro hac vice. (ECF No. 61). The verified petition appoints two resident members of the bar of this court as co-council. Id. However, the local rules require a petitioner to appoint only one resident member as co-council. LR IA 11-2(d). Therefore, the court will deny petitioner's verified petition (ECF No. 61). See LR IA 11-2(h) ("The court may grant or deny a petition to practice under this rule.").
Petitioner shall file, within ten (10) days of the entry of this order, a verified petition that fully complies with the applicable local rules. Failure to timely comply will result in "the striking of any and all documents previously filed by the attorney." LR IA 11-2(j).
Accordingly,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
