Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Steinmetz v. American Honda Finance, 2:19-cv-00067-APG-GWF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190530e75 Visitors: 3
Filed: May 29, 2019
Latest Update: May 29, 2019
Summary: JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (First Request) ORDER ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendant, AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION (erroneously sued as American Honda Finance, and hereinafter "AHFC"), by and through its counsel of record, CHAD C. BUTTERFIELD, ESQ., of the law firm WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP, and Plaintiff, JACQUELINE STEINMETZ, by and
More

JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

(First Request)

ORDER

Defendant, AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION (erroneously sued as American Honda Finance, and hereinafter "AHFC"), by and through its counsel of record, CHAD C. BUTTERFIELD, ESQ., of the law firm WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP, and Plaintiff, JACQUELINE STEINMETZ, by and through her counsel of record, MILES N. CLARK, ESQ. of the law firm KNEPPER & CLARK LLC hereby jointly move to extend AHFC's deadline to file a Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint by seven (7) days.

1. On January 10, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint (ECF No. 1).

2. On March 1, 2019, AHFC filed an Answer to the Complaint (ECF No. 23).

3. On March 11, 2019, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 28).

4. On April 3, 2019, AHFC filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 47).

5. On May 22, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Response to AHFC's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 87).

6. AHFC and Plaintiff have agreed to extend the deadline for AHFC to file its Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint by seven (7) days to allow AHFC to further consider the issues in Plaintiff's Response to the Motion to Dismiss, as well as to continue exploration of the resolution of this case. As a result, both AHFC and Plaintiff request this Court to further extend the date for AHFC to file its Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint until June 5, 2019. This joint motion is made in good faith, is not interposed for delay, and is not filed for an improper purpose.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer