U.S. v. Taylor, 2:16-cr-00369-APG-GWF. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190605a74
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 22, 2019
Latest Update: May 22, 2019
Summary: Order Denying Motion for Sentence Reduction [ECF No. 45] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendant Cedric Taylor filed a motion for reduction of his sentence based upon the First Step Act of 2018. ECF No. 45. Mr. Taylor is not eligible for a reduced sentence under the First Step Act. His motion seems more based on his complaint that his Case Manager at the Oakdale Federal Correctional Institution is not timely processing his paperwork for residential reentry, or is retaliating against
Summary: Order Denying Motion for Sentence Reduction [ECF No. 45] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendant Cedric Taylor filed a motion for reduction of his sentence based upon the First Step Act of 2018. ECF No. 45. Mr. Taylor is not eligible for a reduced sentence under the First Step Act. His motion seems more based on his complaint that his Case Manager at the Oakdale Federal Correctional Institution is not timely processing his paperwork for residential reentry, or is retaliating against h..
More
Order Denying Motion for Sentence Reduction
[ECF No. 45]
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
Defendant Cedric Taylor filed a motion for reduction of his sentence based upon the First Step Act of 2018. ECF No. 45. Mr. Taylor is not eligible for a reduced sentence under the First Step Act. His motion seems more based on his complaint that his Case Manager at the Oakdale Federal Correctional Institution is not timely processing his paperwork for residential reentry, or is retaliating against him for some perceived complaint. Id. A motion for reduced sentence is not the proper vehicle to address those allegations. Mr. Taylor should pursue his administrative remedies through the Bureau of Prisons.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant's motion for reduction of sentence (ECF No. 45) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
