McSwiggin v. Omni Limousine, 2:14-CV-2172 JCM (NJK). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190619c51
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is the matter of McSwiggin et al v. Omni Limousine, case no. 2:14-cv-02172-JCM-NJK. On September 13, 2017, the court granted the parties' joint motion to approve settlement in this matter. (ECF No. 97). In its order approving the settlement, the court agreed to retain "exclusive and continuing jurisdiction" to enforce the settlement agreement. Id. Thereafter, plaintiffs Christy and Kevin McSwiggin ("plaintiffs") filed
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is the matter of McSwiggin et al v. Omni Limousine, case no. 2:14-cv-02172-JCM-NJK. On September 13, 2017, the court granted the parties' joint motion to approve settlement in this matter. (ECF No. 97). In its order approving the settlement, the court agreed to retain "exclusive and continuing jurisdiction" to enforce the settlement agreement. Id. Thereafter, plaintiffs Christy and Kevin McSwiggin ("plaintiffs") filed a..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is the matter of McSwiggin et al v. Omni Limousine, case no. 2:14-cv-02172-JCM-NJK.
On September 13, 2017, the court granted the parties' joint motion to approve settlement in this matter. (ECF No. 97). In its order approving the settlement, the court agreed to retain "exclusive and continuing jurisdiction" to enforce the settlement agreement. Id.
Thereafter, plaintiffs Christy and Kevin McSwiggin ("plaintiffs") filed a motion to enforce settlement. (ECF No. 102). However, on May 7, 2019, plaintiffs filed a notice of withdrawal of the motion to enforce settlement, stating:
As of the date of this Notice, Omni has fully complied with the terms of the settlement agreement and Plaintiffs have been paid in full.
As such, Plaintiffs hereby withdraw their motion to enforce the settlement. No further prosecution of this motion is necessary, and no further action is requested from the Court.
(ECF No. 110 at 2).
Therefore, because plaintiffs have informed the court that no further action is required in this matter, and good cause appearing, the court will close the case.
Accordingly,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
