Johnson v. Whirlpool Corporation, 2:15-cv-02425-JCM-CWH. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190620c42
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE 1 THROUGH 3 [FOURTH REQUEST] JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Defendant WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION ("Defendant") by and through its counsel, Littler Mendelson, and Plaintiff ROBERT JOHNSON (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, Paul Padda Law, hereby agree and stipulate to extend the time for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's Motions in Limine 1 through 3 (ECF No. 84)
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE 1 THROUGH 3 [FOURTH REQUEST] JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Defendant WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION ("Defendant") by and through its counsel, Littler Mendelson, and Plaintiff ROBERT JOHNSON (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, Paul Padda Law, hereby agree and stipulate to extend the time for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's Motions in Limine 1 through 3 (ECF No. 84) f..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE 1 THROUGH 3
[FOURTH REQUEST]
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Defendant WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION ("Defendant") by and through its counsel, Littler Mendelson, and Plaintiff ROBERT JOHNSON (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, Paul Padda Law, hereby agree and stipulate to extend the time for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's Motions in Limine 1 through 3 (ECF No. 84) from the current deadline of June 18, 2019 up to and including July 9, 2019.
The extension is necessary in order to provide the parties additional time to continue settlement discussions. Moreover, the stipulated extension reflects the fact that the trial is now continued to August 26, 2019. This is the fourth request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion.
This request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
Dated: June 18, 2019
Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul S. Padda, Esq. /s/ Marcus B. Smith, Esq.
PAUL S. PADDA, ESQ. MICHAEL A. WILDER, ESQ.
JOSHUA Y. ANG, ESQ. WENDY MEDURA KRINCEK, ESQ.
PAUL PADDA LAW, PLLC MARCUS B. SMITH, ESQ.
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
ROBERT JOHNSON Attorneys for Defendant,
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
ORDER.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
