ORDER RE:

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR NAUTILUS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE CARL W. HOFFMAN'S ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING THE INSUREDS' MOTION TO COMPEL

FIRST REQUEST

MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1(a) and (c), Plaintiffs Access Medical, LLC and Robert "Sonny" Wood, II, (collectively the "Insureds"), by and through their counsel KRAVITZ, SCHNITZER & JOHNSON, CHTD. and THE SCHNITZER LAW FIRM, and Defendant Nautilus Insurance Company ("Nautilus"), by and through its counsel at SELMAN BREITMAN LLP hereby stipulate, agree, and respectfully request that the deadline for Nautilus to Respond to the Insureds' Objection to Magistrate Carl W. Hoffman's Order Granting and Denying the Insureds' Motion to Compel filed on May 23, 2019 [Document 119] (hereinafter "Objection") shall be extended to June 14, 2019.

Nautilus's counsel seeks such extension because its counsel was out of town throughout a majority of the time period prior to the original deadline. Additionally, Nautilus's counsel was also involved in a jury trial in an unrelated matter during the duration of the time period prior to the original deadline. This is the parties first request for an extension of time for Nautilus to file a response to the Objection. Excusable neglect exists because the parties previously agreed to the aforementioned extension prior to expiration of the Response deadline and submitted a stipulation regarding the same prior to the instant amended stipulation. The parties enter into this stipulation in good faith, and without the purpose of delay or dilatory motive.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.