Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Watson, 2:17-CR-124-JAD-GWF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190718b44 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING — SECOND REQUEST JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between NICHOLAS TRUTANICH, ESQ., United States Attorney and ROBERT A. KNIEF, ESQ., Assistant United States Attorney and JENNIFER M. WALDO, ESQ., counsel for KARY WATSON that the Sentencing hearing set for July 23, 2019 be continued to a date and time convenient to this court, but no earlier than 30 days. This stipulation is entered into for the foll
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING — SECOND REQUEST

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between NICHOLAS TRUTANICH, ESQ., United States Attorney and ROBERT A. KNIEF, ESQ., Assistant United States Attorney and JENNIFER M. WALDO, ESQ., counsel for KARY WATSON that the Sentencing hearing set for July 23, 2019 be continued to a date and time convenient to this court, but no earlier than 30 days.

This stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. That counsel requires additional time to review documents and prepare for sentencing in this case; 2. That Mr. Watson is currently in custody and does not object to the continuance; 3. That the additional time requested is for the purposes stated above and not sought for the purposes of delay; 4. That denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice; and 5. That this is the second request to continue the Sentencing hearing in this matter. DATED this 15th day of July, 2019. /s/ Jennifer M. Waldo /s/ Robert A. Knief JENNIFER M. WALDO, ESQ. ROBERT A. KNIEF, ESQ. Counsel for Defendant Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING — SECOND REQUEST

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. That counsel requires additional time to review documents and prepare for sentencing in this case; 2. That Mr. Watson is currently in custody and does not object to the continuance; CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. That the additional time requested is for the purposes stated above and not sought for the purposes of delay; 2. That denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice; and 3. That this is the second request to continue the Sentencing hearing in this matter.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Sentencing Hearing currently scheduled for July 23, 2019 be vacated and continued to September 4, 2019, at the hour of 10:00 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer