Byrd v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00180-KJD-CWH. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190719c03
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#15) of Magistrate Judge C.W. Hoffman, Jr. entered June 28, 2019, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (#13) be denied and that Defendant's Cross-motion to Affirm (#14) be granted. Though the time for doing so has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in acco
Summary: ORDER KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#15) of Magistrate Judge C.W. Hoffman, Jr. entered June 28, 2019, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (#13) be denied and that Defendant's Cross-motion to Affirm (#14) be granted. Though the time for doing so has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accor..
More
ORDER
KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#15) of Magistrate Judge C.W. Hoffman, Jr. entered June 28, 2019, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (#13) be denied and that Defendant's Cross-motion to Affirm (#14) be granted. Though the time for doing so has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation.
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LR IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Report and Recommendation (#15) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered June 28, 2019, should be ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#15) entered June 28, 2019, are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (#13) is DENIED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Cross-motion to Affirm (#14) is GRANTED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendant and against Plaintiff.
Source: Leagle
