Keith v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-01110-JAD-VCF. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190725c34
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2019
Summary: Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, Granting Motion for Remand, Denying Cross-Motion to Affirm, and Remanding Case [ECF No. 15, 22, 24] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Lisa M. Keith brings this action to review the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her applications for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income. Magistrate Judge Ferenbach recommends that I grant Keith's motion to remand, deny the Commissioner's cross-motion
Summary: Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, Granting Motion for Remand, Denying Cross-Motion to Affirm, and Remanding Case [ECF No. 15, 22, 24] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Lisa M. Keith brings this action to review the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her applications for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income. Magistrate Judge Ferenbach recommends that I grant Keith's motion to remand, deny the Commissioner's cross-motion ..
More
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, Granting Motion for Remand, Denying Cross-Motion to Affirm, and Remanding Case
[ECF No. 15, 22, 24]
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
Lisa M. Keith brings this action to review the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her applications for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income. Magistrate Judge Ferenbach recommends that I grant Keith's motion to remand, deny the Commissioner's cross-motion to affirm, and remand this case for further administrative proceedings.1 The deadline for objections to that recommendation was yesterday, and no party has filed an objection to it or moved to extend the deadline to do so. "[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed."2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [ECF No. 24] is ADOPTED in full;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT plaintiff's motion for reversal or remand [ECF No. 15] is GRANTED and the Commissioner's cross-motion to affirm [ECF No. 22] is DENIED. The decision below is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 24].
The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE.
FootNotes
1. ECF No. 24.
2. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Source: Leagle
