Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Shiu v. Equifax Information Services LLC, 2:18-cv-01949-KJD-GWF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190725c59 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME (FIRST REQUEST) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to LR 26-4, plaintiff Millie Phung Shu and defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to modify the Court's Scheduling Order, dated January 29, 2019 (ECF No. 19), to extend the dispositive motion deadline only. The Parties note that no Party has failed to meet any discovery deadline and that the dispositive motion de
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

(FIRST REQUEST)

Pursuant to LR 26-4, plaintiff Millie Phung Shu and defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to modify the Court's Scheduling Order, dated January 29, 2019 (ECF No. 19), to extend the dispositive motion deadline only.

The Parties note that no Party has failed to meet any discovery deadline and that the dispositive motion deadline is not within 21 days. The purpose of this request is to extend the dispositive motion deadline so that the Parties can continue to focus their time and resources on the disposition of this matter without further litigation.

A. Discovery Completed

The Parties have served initial disclosures.

The Parties have exchanged written discovery.

B. Discovery That Remains to Be Completed

Due to recent discussions regarding settlement, Plaintiff requested an extension to submit her discovery responses to August 1, 2019.

Reason Discovery Has Not Been Completed

The Parties have not failed to timely complete any discovery. The discovery cutoff occurred on July 19, 2019. However, due to recent settlement discussions, the Parties agreed to extend Plaintiff's deadline to serve her written discovery responses to August 1, 2019. Because of that extension, the Parties seek to extend the current dispositive motion deadline of August 16, 2019 so that Equifax has sufficient to time to review Plaintiff's discovery responses and evaluate whether a dispositive motion is necessary

Further, the Parties seek the extension requested herein in order to facilitate disposition of the action without further litigation. The Parties have been diligently working towards that end.

The Parties agree that no Party will suffer any prejudice as a result of the relief requested herein. To the contrary, the proposed extension will facilitate a more efficient disposition of this action and preserve judicial resources.

The foregoing constitutes good cause to amend the existing Scheduling Order pursuant to LR 26-4 as requested below.

C. Proposed Schedule for Completion of Discovery

Event Existing Deadline Proposed Deadline Amendment of Pleadings February 26, 2019 Expert Disclosures May 17, 2019 Interim Status Report April 19, 2019 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures June 14, 2019 Close of Discovery July 19, 2019 Dispositive Motions August 16, 2019 September 15, 2019 Joint Pre-Trial Order January 13, 2020

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties to extend the schedule for dispositive deadline as provided herein.

The Parties respectfully request the Court "so-order" this Stipulation

Dated this 23rd day of July, 2019 CRAIG K. PERRY & ASSOCIATES By: /s/Craig K. Perry Craig K. Perry, Esq. 3450 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 400 North Las Vegas, NV 89032 Attorneys for Plaintiff Millie Phung Shiu Dated this 23rd day of July, 2019 CLARK HILL PLLC By: /s/Jeremy J. Thompson Nicholas M. Wieczorek, Esq. Jeremy J. Thompson, Esq. 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 500 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorneys for Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer