X20 Media, Inc. v. Xentiant Technologies, 2:18-cv-1645-JCM-CWH. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190730857
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is the matter of X20 Media, Inc. v. Xentiant Technologies et al, case no. 2:18-cv-01645-JCM-CWH. On July 3, 2019, the court granted the parties' stipulation to stay these proceedings in light of the parties' settlement, which resolves all claims in this matter. (ECF No. 54). Thereafter, Magistrate Judge Hoffman entered an order instructing the parties to file a stipulated dismissal or joint status report no later than Aug
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is the matter of X20 Media, Inc. v. Xentiant Technologies et al, case no. 2:18-cv-01645-JCM-CWH. On July 3, 2019, the court granted the parties' stipulation to stay these proceedings in light of the parties' settlement, which resolves all claims in this matter. (ECF No. 54). Thereafter, Magistrate Judge Hoffman entered an order instructing the parties to file a stipulated dismissal or joint status report no later than Augu..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is the matter of X20 Media, Inc. v. Xentiant Technologies et al, case no. 2:18-cv-01645-JCM-CWH.
On July 3, 2019, the court granted the parties' stipulation to stay these proceedings in light of the parties' settlement, which resolves all claims in this matter. (ECF No. 54). Thereafter, Magistrate Judge Hoffman entered an order instructing the parties to file a stipulated dismissal or joint status report no later than August 10, 2019. (ECF No. 55).
In light of the settlement reached in this action, the court will deny the pending motions to dismiss in this matter (ECF Nos. 17, 26, 33, 38) without prejudice to the parties' ability to renew the motions should the settlement not materialize.
Accordingly,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
