Filed: Jul. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . On January 25, 2006, this court dismissed petitioner Renard T. Polk's pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 with prejudice (ECF No. 29). Judgment was entered on January 26, 2006 (ECF No. 30). Polk appealed, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Polk's request for a certificate of appealability on December 1, 2006 (ECF No. 37). Despite this court's October 29, 2014 order directing that Polk shall file no further d
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . On January 25, 2006, this court dismissed petitioner Renard T. Polk's pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 with prejudice (ECF No. 29). Judgment was entered on January 26, 2006 (ECF No. 30). Polk appealed, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Polk's request for a certificate of appealability on December 1, 2006 (ECF No. 37). Despite this court's October 29, 2014 order directing that Polk shall file no further do..
More
ORDER
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
On January 25, 2006, this court dismissed petitioner Renard T. Polk's pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 with prejudice (ECF No. 29). Judgment was entered on January 26, 2006 (ECF No. 30). Polk appealed, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Polk's request for a certificate of appealability on December 1, 2006 (ECF No. 37).
Despite this court's October 29, 2014 order directing that Polk shall file no further documents in this closed action, he has persisted in filing numerous motions that seek to relitigate his federal habeas claims (see ECF Nos. 41, 45, 52, 58, 59, 64). In accordance with this court's previous orders (ECF Nos. 41, 58),
IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's motion for request for submission (ECF No. 59) and motion to modify and terminate prospective relief (ECF No. 64) are both DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as reasonable jurists would not find the denial of these motions to be debatable, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
