Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Moreno-Ochoa, 2:18-cr-00116-JAD-CWH. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190806778 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 43) (Defendant's 2nd Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between JARED GRIMMER, Assistant United States Attorney, ANDREW M. LEAVITT, ESQ, and MATTHEW D. COX, ESQ., counsel for ERIC MORENO-OCHOA that the Defendant's Reply to the Government's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 43) that was due July 19, 2019 h
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 43)

(Defendant's 2nd Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between JARED GRIMMER, Assistant United States Attorney, ANDREW M. LEAVITT, ESQ, and MATTHEW D. COX, ESQ., counsel for ERIC MORENO-OCHOA that the Defendant's Reply to the Government's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 43) that was due July 19, 2019 he continued to August 2, 2019.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Defendant's counsel needs additional time to properly reply to the Government's Response in Opposition to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss to include researching the issues raised by the Government.

2. Denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

3. This is the Defendant's 2nd Request for continuance of the Defendant's Reply to the Government's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.

DATED this 25th day of July, 2019. /Andrew M. Leavitt Esq./ /Jared L. Grimmer, Esq./ ANDREW M. LEAVITT, ESQ. JARED L. GRIMMER, ESQ. Bar # 3989 Assistant U.S. Attorney MATTHEW D. COX, ESQ. 501 Las Vegas Blvd. South Bar # 10556 Suite 1100 Law Offices of Andrew M. Leavitt Las Vegas, NV 89101 633 S. 7th Street Attorney for Plaintiffs Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorney for Defendant

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Defendant's Reply to Government's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 43) that was due on Friday, August 19, 2019, be continued August 2, 2019.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer