Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Carter, 2:19-cr-093-RFB-EJY. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190828d10 Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS OR ALTERNATIVELY MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE (ECF 26 (FIRST REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States hereby motions, by and between Nicholas A. Trutanich, United States Attorney, and Linda Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Maggie Lambrose, Assistant Federal
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS OR ALTERNATIVELY MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE (ECF 26

(FIRST REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States hereby motions, by and between Nicholas A. Trutanich, United States Attorney, and Linda Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Maggie Lambrose, Assistant Federal Public Defender, that the deadline of August 26, 2019, for the government to file its Response be extended for an additional day to August 27, 2019.

The Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. A Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively Motion to Suppress Evidence (ECF 26) was filed on August 12, 2019. Counsel for the government is investigating the numerous claims that were raised in Defendant's motion, specifically the time at which officers arrived on scene.

2. Counsel for the government requests the additional day to further investigate the claims and, if so needed, bring any issues to the attention of supervisors.

3. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but to allow counsel for both the government and defense to prepare for any evidentiary hearing, and to further discuss any possible resolution to the case.

4. The defendant is in custody and agrees to the additional one day.

5. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), when considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). In addition, the continuance sought is not for delay and the ends of justice are in fact served by the granting of such continuance which outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

6. This is the first stipulation to continue filed herein.

NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH United States Attorney /s/ Margaret Lambrose /s/ Linda Mott MARGARET LAMBROSE LINDA MOTT Counsel for Defendant Randy Carter Assistant United States Attorney

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. Counsel for the government needs additional time to review the issues raised in Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively Motion to Suppress Evidence (ECF 26).

2. The additional one day requested time will allow the government to thoroughly review those issues.

3. Defendant Carter is incarcerated and agrees to the continuance.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The continuance sought herein is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for trial, as well conduct an evidentiary hearing, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

The continuance sought herein is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Government has until August 27, 2019, to respond to the Motion to Suppress filed August 12, 2019. Counsel for the Defendant will then have until September 3, 2019, to reply.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer