Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Marcianti, 2:11-cr-00452-APG-CWH. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190903885 Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2019
Summary: Order Denying Motion to Correct Judgment [ECF No. 230] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Eve Mazzarella is not a party to this case. She was convicted in case number 2:08-cr-64 and ordered to pay $2,275,025.00 in restitution. Ms. Mazzarella's name is included on a "restitution list" attached to the $31,971,250.80 judgment entered in this case against defendant Theresa Marcianti. ECF No. 190 at 14. Ms. Mazzarella fears the "potential" that someone may believe she owes the of restitution f
More

Order Denying Motion to Correct Judgment

[ECF No. 230]

Eve Mazzarella is not a party to this case. She was convicted in case number 2:08-cr-64 and ordered to pay $2,275,025.00 in restitution. Ms. Mazzarella's name is included on a "restitution list" attached to the $31,971,250.80 judgment entered in this case against defendant Theresa Marcianti. ECF No. 190 at 14. Ms. Mazzarella fears the "potential" that someone may believe she owes the of restitution from this case. So, Ms. Mazzarella filed a motion to correct the judgment in this case and remove her name from the restitution list. ECF No. 230.

Ms. Mazzarella does not have standing to challenge the judgment entered in this case because she is not a party to it. United States v. Kovall, 857 F.3d 1060, 1065-66 (9th Cir. 2017). But even if Ms. Mazzarella has standing (because she is named in the attachment to the judgment), she has suffered no injury as a result of the judgment. There is no "potential" prejudice to her because the Government has recorded against her a notice of lien for the judgment in her case. See ECF No. 231-2. The recorded lien is only for the lesser amount of restitution ordered payable by Ms. Mazzarella. Her restitution obligation was not increased by the judgment in this case. She is simply identified as being jointly and severally liable for the losses in the apportioned amount in the judgment against her. Thus, there is no need to modify the judgment in this case as Ms. Mazzarella requests.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Ms. Mazzarella's motion (ECF No. 230) is denied.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer