Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Thompson, 2:18-cr-00213-APG-EJY. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190905c04 Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO SENTENCING (Fifth Request) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between, the United States of America, through the undersigned, together with Monti J. Levy, counsel for defendant BOBBY THOMPSON, that the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for September 5, 2019 at 2 p.m., be vacated and reset to a date and time convenient to the Court but no sooner than 60 days. This stipulation is entered into for the following reasons: 1. The
More

STIPULATION TO SENTENCING

(Fifth Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between, the United States of America, through the undersigned, together with Monti J. Levy, counsel for defendant BOBBY THOMPSON, that the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for September 5, 2019 at 2 p.m., be vacated and reset to a date and time convenient to the Court but no sooner than 60 days.

This stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. The parties need additional time to prepare support for their positions, file sentencing memoranda and prepare for argument.

2. The Defendant is currently incarcerated and does not object to the continuance.

3. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

4. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

5. This is the fourth request for a continuance of the sentencing hearing.

DATED this 3rd day of September, 2019 NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH UNITED STATES ATTORNEY s/Nadia Ahmed s/Monti Levy _______________________________ __________________________ NADIA AHMED MONTI J. LEVY Assistant United States Attorney Counsel for Defendant Bobby Thompson

ORDER

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy sentencing, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for sentencing, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that sentencing in the above-captioned matter currently scheduled for September 5, 2019 at 2:00 p.m., be vacated and continued to November 1, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6C.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer