Nash ex rel. A.R.N.H. v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-00484-KJD-BNW. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190930d91
Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#22) of Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler entered September 6, 2019, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (#17) be denied and that Defendant's Cross-motions to Affirm (#18/19) be granted. Though the time for doing so has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in
Summary: ORDER KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#22) of Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler entered September 6, 2019, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (#17) be denied and that Defendant's Cross-motions to Affirm (#18/19) be granted. Though the time for doing so has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in ..
More
ORDER
KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#22) of Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler entered September 6, 2019, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (#17) be denied and that Defendant's Cross-motions to Affirm (#18/19) be granted. Though the time for doing so has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation.
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LR IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Report and Recommendation (#22) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered September 6, 2019, should be ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#22) entered September 6, 2019, are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (#17) is DENIED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Cross-motions to Affirm (#18/19) are GRANTED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendant and against Plaintiff.
Source: Leagle
