Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Crawford v. Smith's Food and Drug Store, Inc., 2:12-cv-00122-GMN-GWF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20191011i87 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER GLORIA M. NAVARRO , District Judge . Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Milton O. Crawford's ("Plaintiff's) Motion for Leave to File Request for Judgment ("Motion for Judgment"), (ECF No. 298), Motion for Leave to File Certificate of Service as to Affidavit, (ECF No. 299), regarding his Motion for Judgment, Motion for Leave to File Server Affidavit of Service, (ECF No. 301), regarding his Motion for Judgment, and Motion for Leave to File Certificate of Service, (ECF No. 302), to h
More

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Milton O. Crawford's ("Plaintiff's) Motion for Leave to File Request for Judgment ("Motion for Judgment"), (ECF No. 298), Motion for Leave to File Certificate of Service as to Affidavit, (ECF No. 299), regarding his Motion for Judgment, Motion for Leave to File Server Affidavit of Service, (ECF No. 301), regarding his Motion for Judgment, and Motion for Leave to File Certificate of Service, (ECF No. 302), to his Motion for Judgment.

Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment requests leave to file a motion for the Clerk of Court to enter default judgment against Defendant Kroger Co. ("Kroger") for failing to appear. (Mot. Leave to File Request for Judgment 2:2-7, ECF No. 298). Not only has Kroger made numerous appearances in this case, but the Court also issued an Order, (ECF No. 141), granting Kroger's Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 71), Plaintiff's claims against it with prejudice.

The Court denies Plaintiff's Motion for Judgement. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(1), clerk's entry of default is proper only if the defendant has not made an appearance. Because Kroger has appeared in this action, and given that the Court has dismissed Plaintiff's claims against Kroger with prejudice, clerk's entry of default would be improper.

Since the Court denies Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment, the Court denies as moot Plaintiff's remaining Motions. The remaining Motions request leave to file necessary papers associated with Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment. In light of the Court's denial of Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment, Plaintiff need not make the associated filings.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Request for Judgment, (ECF No. 298), is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Certificate of Service as to Affidavit, (ECF No. 299), is DENIED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Server Affidavit of Service, (ECF No. 301), is DENIED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Certificate of Service, (ECF No. 302), is DENIED as moot.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer