Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Marutyan v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 2:16-cv-01089-MMD-GWF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20191024c33 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , Chief District Judge . This case has recently been remanded for further proceedings after appeal before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which vacated this Court's decision (ECF No. 55) in part. (ECF No. 66.) It is therefore ordered that the Clerk of Court reopen this case. It is further ordered, pursuant to the Ninth Circuit's order, that the Judgment of this Court (ECF No. 58) is vacated in part to allow Plaintiffs Ara V. Marutyan, Arthur Marutyan, and Diana Maru
More

ORDER

This case has recently been remanded for further proceedings after appeal before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which vacated this Court's decision (ECF No. 55) in part. (ECF No. 66.)

It is therefore ordered that the Clerk of Court reopen this case.

It is further ordered, pursuant to the Ninth Circuit's order, that the Judgment of this Court (ECF No. 58) is vacated in part to allow Plaintiffs Ara V. Marutyan, Arthur Marutyan, and Diana Marutyan to proceed on their Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process claim as alleged in the operative First Amended Complaint. (See ECF No. 66 at 3.)

The Court refers this matter to the magistrate judge to establish a scheduling order to allow the case to proceed accordingly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer