Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Snap Lock Industries, Inc. v. Swisstrax Corporation, 2:17-cv-02742-RFB-BNW. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20191030p59 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2019
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION TO HEAR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION REQUESTING REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPT AT THE NOVEMBER 14, 2019 HEARING (FIRST REQUEST) BRENDA WEKSLER , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Snap Lock Industries, Inc. ("Snap Lock"), through its undersigned counsel, hereby respectfully submits this Unopposed Motion to Hear Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Redaction of Transcript at the November 14, 2019, Hearing. 1. On October 5, 2018, Snap Lock filed Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Redaction of Transcript of D
More

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO HEAR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION REQUESTING REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPT AT THE NOVEMBER 14, 2019 HEARING

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff Snap Lock Industries, Inc. ("Snap Lock"), through its undersigned counsel, hereby respectfully submits this Unopposed Motion to Hear Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Redaction of Transcript at the November 14, 2019, Hearing.

1. On October 5, 2018, Snap Lock filed Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Redaction of Transcript of December 18, 2017, Hearing ("Redaction Motion"). See ECF No. 83.

2. The Redaction Motion has not been ruled upon.

3. On March 8, 2019, the parties filed a Joint Stipulated Motion to Stay Case Deadlines Pending Settlement Discussions. See ECF No. 116.

4. In response to the Join Stipulated Motion to Stay Case Deadlines Pending Settlement Discussions, on March 14, 2019, the Court entered an Order deeming several motions, including the Redaction Motion, as withdrawn, without prejudice to requesting reinstatement if the case was not resolved via mediation. See ECF No. 122.

5. At an August 1, 2019, Status Conference, the parties advised the Court that settlement discussions were ongoing, but requested that the motions previously taken off calendar be rescheduled for hearing. See ECF No. 128. The Court set a further status conference for September 3, 2019, and rescheduled the previously withdrawn motions for hearing on October 15, 2019. See id.

6. At the September 3, 2019, Status Conference, the Court indicated that if Plaintiff wished to have Plaintiff's Redaction Motion heard at the upcoming October 15, 2019, hearing related to discovery motions, Plaintiff needed to so request. See ECF No. 129.

7. On October 8, 2019, the Court entered an Order rescheduling the October 15, 2019, hearing to October 31, 2019, due to scheduling conflicts. See ECF No. 130.

8. On October 9, 2019, Snap Lock filed an unopposed motion to continue the October 31, 2019, hearing. See ECF No. 131.

9. On October 16, 2019, the Court entered an Order rescheduling the October 31, 2019, hearing for November 14, 2019. See ECF No. 134.

10. Pursuant to the Court's direction at the September 3, 2019, Status Conference, Snap Lock hereby respectfully requests that the Redaction Motion be heard at the November 14, 2019 hearing.

11. Counsel for Swisstrax Corporation does not oppose this request.

12. The Parties do not currently have a trial date.

13. Good cause exists for this request. The Parties are not seeking the continuance for purposes of undue delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer