Roberts v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 2:18-cv-649-APG-NJK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20191105711
Filed: Oct. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER (ECF No. 70) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . The defendants filed a proposed pretrial order. ECF No. 70. Local Rule 16-3)(b) requires a joint proposed pretrial order. The defendants' filing includes no input from the plaintiff, nor does it state whether a discussion of the proposed order was held or attempted as required by Local Rule 16-3(b). The defendants' proposed pretrial order (ECF No. 70) is DENIED. The parties are to confer and file a joint proposed pretrial order by De
Summary: ORDER (ECF No. 70) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . The defendants filed a proposed pretrial order. ECF No. 70. Local Rule 16-3)(b) requires a joint proposed pretrial order. The defendants' filing includes no input from the plaintiff, nor does it state whether a discussion of the proposed order was held or attempted as required by Local Rule 16-3(b). The defendants' proposed pretrial order (ECF No. 70) is DENIED. The parties are to confer and file a joint proposed pretrial order by Dec..
More
ORDER
(ECF No. 70)
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
The defendants filed a proposed pretrial order. ECF No. 70. Local Rule 16-3)(b) requires a joint proposed pretrial order. The defendants' filing includes no input from the plaintiff, nor does it state whether a discussion of the proposed order was held or attempted as required by Local Rule 16-3(b). The defendants' proposed pretrial order (ECF No. 70) is DENIED. The parties are to confer and file a joint proposed pretrial order by December 6, 2019. If it is not possible to file a joint proposed pretrial order, the parties shall file briefs explaining why.
Source: Leagle
