MIRANDA M. DU, Chief District Judge.
On June 24, 2019, the Court reviewed Petitioner Jonathan Moncada's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition and directed the Clerk to file and serve the petition. (ECF No. 3.) The Court also denied his motion for appointment of counsel. (Id.)
On September 20, 2019, Respondents filed a motion for clarification (ECF No. 7). Respondents inform the Court that Moncada entered into a global plea agreement on two cases (which Respondents refer to as Case A and Case B).
After Respondents filed their motion, Moncada filed a motion for reconsideration of this court's denial of his motion for counsel. (ECF No. 14.) As the Court explained previously, the decision to appoint counsel is generally discretionary. See Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1023 (1987); Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 838 (1984). However, there may be complexities in this case that warrant appointment of counsel in order to ensure due process. See Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196; see also Hawkins v. Bennett, 423 F.2d 948 (8th Cir.1970). Notably, Respondents filed a notice of their non-opposition to reconsideration of the denial of counsel. (ECF No. 15.) In light of these two motions, the Court grants the motion to reconsider its order denying the motion for appointment of counsel.
It is therefore ordered that Petitioner's motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 14) is granted. This Court's order dated June 24, 2019 is vacated.
It is further ordered that Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 5) is granted.
It is further ordered that the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada ("FPD") is appointed to represent Petitioner.
It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court electronically serve the FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 4). The FPD will have 30 days from the date of entry of this order to file a notice of appearance, or to indicate to the Court its inability to represent Petitioner in these proceedings.
It is further ordered that after counsel has appeared for Petitioner in this case, the court will issue a scheduling order, which will, among other things, set a deadline for the filing of an amended petition.
It is further ordered that Respondents' motion for clarification (ECF No. 7) is denied without prejudice as moot.
It is further ordered that Respondents' motion for leave to file presentence report under seal (ECF No. 11) is granted.