Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McKenna v. Chesnoff, 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-DJA. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20191108g39 Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2019
Summary: Order Granting Motion for Leave to Supplement MIL [ECF No. 191] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Michelle McKenna moves in limine to limit the trial testimony of defendants' expert, Jerome Barakos, M.D., to matters that she contends fall within his area of expertise and are properly supported by an accurate and complete set of the relevant facts. 1 McKenna contends that several of Barakos's opinions are unsupported because they are based on only his review of the imaging st
More

Order Granting Motion for Leave to Supplement MIL

[ECF No. 191]

Plaintiff Michelle McKenna moves in limine to limit the trial testimony of defendants' expert, Jerome Barakos, M.D., to matters that she contends fall within his area of expertise and are properly supported by an accurate and complete set of the relevant facts.1 McKenna contends that several of Barakos's opinions are unsupported because they are based on only his review of the imaging studies that had been performed on McKenna.2 In their response, defendants disagree that the imaging studies are all Barakos relied on in forming his opinions, but concede that they inadvertently omitted the exhibit listing the materials that Barakos relied on when they produced his report to McKenna during discovery.3 Defendants argue that this omission "is immaterial," however, because all of the materials that Barakos considered had been produced except a report and presentation from Dr. Orrison, who is now deceased, and "Barakos reviewed all images reviewed by Dr. Orrison and formulated his own opinion anyway."4

McKenna now moves to supplement her motion in limine to completely exclude Barakos from testifying at trial.5 In light of the belated reveal of the exhibit to Barakos's report and his apparent reliance on two items that had not been disclosed during discovery, I find good cause exists to permit McKenna to supplement her motion in limine.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that McKenna's motion for leave to supplement [ECF No. 191] is GRANTED. McKenna must file the supplement to her motion in limine by November 8, 2019.6 Defendants must file any response to that supplement by November 13, 2019.

FootNotes


1. ECF No. 175 at 5-13.
2. Id. at 10.
3. ECF No. 190 at 7.
4. Id.
5. ECF No. 191.
6. See ECF No. 191-3 (proposed supplement).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer