Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gonzalez v. Saul, 2:17-cv-03118-APG-NJK. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20191205c55 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2019
Summary: Order Accepting Report and Recommendation, Denying Motion to Remand, and Granting Motion to Affirm [ECF Nos. 19, 21, 27] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . On November 15, 2019, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I deny plaintiff Sonia Gonzalez's motion to remand and grant defendant Andrew Saul's motion to affirm. ECF No. 27. Gonzalez did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) (requiring dist
More

Order Accepting Report and Recommendation, Denying Motion to Remand, and Granting Motion to Affirm

[ECF Nos. 19, 21, 27]

On November 15, 2019, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I deny plaintiff Sonia Gonzalez's motion to remand and grant defendant Andrew Saul's motion to affirm. ECF No. 27. Gonzalez did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).

I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe's report and recommendation (ECF No. 27) is accepted, plaintiff Sonia Gonzalez's motion to remand (ECF No. 19) is DENIED, and defendant Andrew Saul's motion to affirm (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer