Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ehmann v. Desert Palace, LLC, 2:19-cv-01199-APG-BNW. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20191209b34 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER BRENDA WEKSLER , Magistrate Judge . In reviewing the docket in this case, it has come to the court's attention that the parties have not filed a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Local Rule 26-1(a) requires that the "plaintiff's attorney must initiate the scheduling of the conference required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) to be held within 30 days after the first defendant answers or otherwise appears. Fourteen days after the mandatory Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, the part
More

ORDER

In reviewing the docket in this case, it has come to the court's attention that the parties have not filed a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Local Rule 26-1(a) requires that the "plaintiff's attorney must initiate the scheduling of the conference required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) to be held within 30 days after the first defendant answers or otherwise appears. Fourteen days after the mandatory Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, the parties must submit a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order." Here, defendants filed motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 24, 26) on September 15, 2019, making the stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order due November 29, 2019. To date, the parties have not filed a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within 21 days from the date of this order, the parties must meet and confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer