Berry v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 2:19-cv-00640-APG-NJK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20191216b28
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2019
Summary: Order [Docket No. 72] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons outlined in the order at Docket No. 73, the Court STRIKES the declaration of service of a discovery subpoena, along with a copy of that subpoena. Docket No. 72. The Court instructs counsel to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent an order that they do so. The Court further cautions counsel that they must comply with the redaction requirements for personal identifiers moving forw
Summary: Order [Docket No. 72] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons outlined in the order at Docket No. 73, the Court STRIKES the declaration of service of a discovery subpoena, along with a copy of that subpoena. Docket No. 72. The Court instructs counsel to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent an order that they do so. The Court further cautions counsel that they must comply with the redaction requirements for personal identifiers moving forwa..
More
Order
[Docket No. 72]
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons outlined in the order at Docket No. 73, the Court STRIKES the declaration of service of a discovery subpoena, along with a copy of that subpoena. Docket No. 72. The Court instructs counsel to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent an order that they do so. The Court further cautions counsel that they must comply with the redaction requirements for personal identifiers moving forward.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
