Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Barnett v. Equifax Information Services LLC, 2:19-cv-02008-KJD-DJA. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20191231b38 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER DANIEL J. ALBREGTS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 7), filed on December 20, 2019. The Court notes that the parties' plan fails to comply with Local Rule 26-1 for several reasons. First, it fails to state the number of days required for discovery as measured by the date Defendant first appeared as outlined in Local Rule 26-1(a). Further, the parties fail to include the information required by
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 7), filed on December 20, 2019. The Court notes that the parties' plan fails to comply with Local Rule 26-1 for several reasons. First, it fails to state the number of days required for discovery as measured by the date Defendant first appeared as outlined in Local Rule 26-1(a). Further, the parties fail to include the information required by LR 26-1(b)(6-9). Accordingly,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties' Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 7) is denied without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and file a revised stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order in compliance with Local Rule 26-1 by January 6, 2020.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer