Armstrong v. Reynolds, 2:17-cv-02528-APG-CWH. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20200127571
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 21, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2020
Summary: Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case [ECF Nos. 83, 98, 101] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . On October 4, 2019, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I deny plaintiff Helen Armstrong's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (ECF No. 83) and that I dismiss her case with prejudice. ECF No. 98. Ms. Armstrong objected to that recommendation (ECF No. 99) and also requested leave to file a reply in support of her objection (ECF No. 101). I have con
Summary: Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case [ECF Nos. 83, 98, 101] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . On October 4, 2019, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I deny plaintiff Helen Armstrong's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (ECF No. 83) and that I dismiss her case with prejudice. ECF No. 98. Ms. Armstrong objected to that recommendation (ECF No. 99) and also requested leave to file a reply in support of her objection (ECF No. 101). I have cond..
More
Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case
[ECF Nos. 83, 98, 101]
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
On October 4, 2019, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I deny plaintiff Helen Armstrong's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (ECF No. 83) and that I dismiss her case with prejudice. ECF No. 98. Ms. Armstrong objected to that recommendation (ECF No. 99) and also requested leave to file a reply in support of her objection (ECF No. 101).
I have conducted a de novo review of the issues set forth in the Report and Recommendation under Local Rule IB 3-2. Judge Albregts' Report and Recommendation sets forth the proper legal analysis and the factual basis for the decision, and I accept and adopt it as my own. I have reviewed Ms. Armstrong's proposed reply in support of her objection, but it does not change my analysis. I therefore deny her motion for leave to file a reply
I THEREFORE ORDER that Ms. Armstrong's motion for leave to file a reply (ECF No. 101) is denied.
I FURTHER ORDER that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 98) is accepted, Ms. Armstrong's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (ECF No. 83) is denied, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The clerk of the court shall enter Judgment accordingly and close this case.
Source: Leagle
