Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

White v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 2:19-cv-00386-GMN-NJK. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20200203d64 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 31, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2020
Summary: Order [Docket No. 39] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . On December 18, 2019, the Court struck Plaintiff's initial disclosures as improperly filed on the docket, rather than served on opposing counsel. Docket No. 31. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff's filing again of initial disclosures. Docket No. 39. Discovery-related documents must be served on opposing counsel, not filed on the docket unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P
More

Order

[Docket No. 39]

On December 18, 2019, the Court struck Plaintiff's initial disclosures as improperly filed on the docket, rather than served on opposing counsel. Docket No. 31. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff's filing again of initial disclosures. Docket No. 39.

Discovery-related documents must be served on opposing counsel, not filed on the docket unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered in this case. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the above-referenced document, and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court order that they do so.

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER AND WITH THE GOVERNING RULES MORE GENERALLY MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer