James v. Saul, 2:18-cv-01322-NJK. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20200203d65
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 31, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2020
Summary: ORDER (Docket Nos. 15, 19) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . On January 14, 2020, the undersigned issued a report and recommendation that the motion for reversal or remand be denied and that the countermotion to affirm be granted. Docket No. 27. Pursuant to the pilot program regarding magistrate judge consent in social security cases, see General Order 2019-08, the parties have since consented to the undersigned magistrate judge's handling of this case, see Docket No. 30; see also
Summary: ORDER (Docket Nos. 15, 19) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . On January 14, 2020, the undersigned issued a report and recommendation that the motion for reversal or remand be denied and that the countermotion to affirm be granted. Docket No. 27. Pursuant to the pilot program regarding magistrate judge consent in social security cases, see General Order 2019-08, the parties have since consented to the undersigned magistrate judge's handling of this case, see Docket No. 30; see also F..
More
ORDER
(Docket Nos. 15, 19)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
On January 14, 2020, the undersigned issued a report and recommendation that the motion for reversal or remand be denied and that the countermotion to affirm be granted. Docket No. 27. Pursuant to the pilot program regarding magistrate judge consent in social security cases, see General Order 2019-08, the parties have since consented to the undersigned magistrate judge's handling of this case, see Docket No. 30; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(a); 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).
Accordingly, the Court hereby incorporates the findings and analysis in the report and recommendation into this order, DENIES the motion for reversal or remand (Docket No. 15), and GRANTS the countermotion to affirm (Docket No. 19). For the reasons stated in the report and recommendation, Docket No. 27, the decision below is AFFIRMED. The Clerk's Office is instructed to ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT accordingly and to CLOSE this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
