Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Martinez, 2:19-cv-01986-GMN-DJA. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20200204b29 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 31, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2020
Summary: JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AND CHASE MORTGAGE COMPANY TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST) DANIEL J. ALBREGTS , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (hereafter "Plaintiff") through its attorney E. Carmen Ramirez, and Defendants JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and CHASE MORTGAGE COMPANY, (collectively "Chase") through their attorney Justin T. Grim, Esq., that Defendants Chase may have
More

JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AND CHASE MORTGAGE COMPANY TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (hereafter "Plaintiff") through its attorney E. Carmen Ramirez, and Defendants JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and CHASE MORTGAGE COMPANY, (collectively "Chase") through their attorney Justin T. Grim, Esq., that Defendants Chase may have additional time within which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Specifically, the parties have agreed to extend Defendants' time to respond. Defendants may answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before February 21, 2020.

The parties further agree that good cause exists for this extension. The amended response deadline allows Defendants to continue investigating the matter and for the parties to continue their discussions regarding the dispute.

Therefore, Plaintiff and Chase hereby jointly move for an order extending Chase's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before February 21, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer