Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Lopez-Verdugo, 2:18-CR-391-KJD-VCF. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20200205a54 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2020
Summary: Stipulation to Modify the Plea Agreement as to Jose Antonio Lopez-Verdugo and Order KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . The United States of America and Jose Antonio Lopez-Verdugo, and his counsel, Paul Riddle, agree as follows: 1. The government and Jose Antonio Lopez-Verdugo seek to modify the Plea Agreement (ECF No. 46) only as to the forfeiture. The Plea Agreement will remain in effect as to all other aspects of the agreement. DEFENDANT'S OBLIGATION REGARDING FORFEITURE 2. The defendan
More

Stipulation to Modify the Plea Agreement as to Jose Antonio Lopez-Verdugo and Order

The United States of America and Jose Antonio Lopez-Verdugo, and his counsel, Paul Riddle, agree as follows:

1. The government and Jose Antonio Lopez-Verdugo seek to modify the Plea Agreement (ECF No. 46) only as to the forfeiture. The Plea Agreement will remain in effect as to all other aspects of the agreement.

DEFENDANT'S OBLIGATION REGARDING FORFEITURE

2. The defendant agrees to the forfeiture of the property, the imposition of the forfeiture on the property, and the imposition of the in personam criminal forfeiture money judgment as set forth in the Plea Agreement and this Stipulation to Modify the Plea Agreement as to Jose Antonio Lopez-Verdugo and Order.

CONSEQUENCES OF CONVICTION REGARDING FORFEITURE

3. Criminal Forfeiture: Defendant understands that the district court will impose forfeiture of the property and of the in personam criminal forfeiture money judgment.

FORFEITURE

4. The defendant knowingly and voluntarily:

a. Agrees to the district court imposing the civil judicial forfeiture or the criminal forfeiture of $19,104 in United States Currency (property);

b. Agrees to the district court imposing an in personam criminal forfeiture money judgment of $59,500, and that the property will be applied toward the payment of the money judgment;

c. Agrees the in personam criminal forfeiture money judgment amount complies with Honeycutt v. United States, 137 S.Ct. 1626 (2017);

d. Agrees to the abandonment, the civil administrative forfeiture, the civil judicial forfeiture, or the criminal forfeiture of the property;

e. Abandons or forfeits the property to the United States;

f. Relinquishes all possessory rights, ownership rights, and all rights, titles, and interests in the property;

g. Waives defendant's right to any abandonment proceedings, any civil administrative forfeiture proceedings, any civil judicial forfeiture proceedings, or any criminal forfeiture proceedings of the property (proceedings);

h. Waives service of process of any and all documents filed in this action or any proceedings concerning the property arising from the facts and circumstances of this case;

i. Waives any further notice to defendant, defendant's agents, or defendant's attorney regarding the abandonment or the forfeiture and disposition of the property;

j. Agrees not to file any claim, answer, petition, or other documents in any proceedings concerning the property and the in personam criminal forfeiture money judgment; agrees not to contest, or to assist any other person or entity in contesting, the forfeiture; and agrees to withdraw immediately any claim, answer, petition, or other documents in any proceedings;

k. Waives the statute of limitations, the CAFRA requirements, Fed. R. Crim. P. 7, 11, 32.2, and 43(a), including, but not limited to, forfeiture notice in the charging document, the court advising defendant of the forfeiture at the change of plea, the court having a forfeiture hearing, the court making factual findings regarding the forfeiture, the court failing to announce the forfeiture at sentencing, and all constitutional requirements, including but not limited to, the constitutional due process requirements of any proceedings concerning the property;

l. Waives defendant's right to a jury trial on the forfeiture of the property;

m. Waives all constitutional, legal, and equitable defenses to the forfeiture or abandonment of the property and the in personam criminal forfeiture money judgment in any proceedings, including, but not limited to, (a) any constitutional or statutory double jeopardy defense or claim, (b) any constitutional or statutory claim or defense under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, including, but not limited to, any claim or defense of excessive fines or cruel and unusual punishments, and (c) any constitutional or statutory claim or defense under Honeycutt v. United States, 137 S.Ct. 1626 (2017);

n. Agrees to the entry of an Order of Forfeiture of the property and the in personam criminal forfeiture money judgment to the United States;

o. Waives the right to appeal any Order of Forfeiture;

p. Agrees the property is forfeited to the United States;

q. Agrees the in personam criminal forfeiture money judgment is immediately due and payable and is subject to immediate collection by the USAO;

r. Agrees and understands the abandonment, the civil administrative forfeiture, the civil judicial forfeiture, or the criminal forfeiture of the property shall not be treated as satisfaction of any assessment, fine, restitution, cost of imprisonment, or any other penalty the Court may impose upon defendant in addition to the abandonment or the forfeiture;

s. Agrees and understands the USAO may amend the forfeiture order at any time to add subsequently located property or substitute property pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2)(C) and 32.2(e);

t. Acknowledges that the amount of the forfeiture may differ from, and may be significantly greater than or less than, the amount of restitution; and

u. Agrees to take all steps as requested by the USAO to pass clear title of the property and of any forfeitable assets which may be used to satisfy the in personam criminal forfeiture money judgment to the United States and to testify truthfully in any judicial forfeiture proceedings. Defendant understands and agrees that the property and the in personam criminal forfeiture money judgment amount represent proceeds and/or facilitating property of illegal conduct and are forfeitable. Defendant shall provide the USAO with a full and complete financial disclosure statement under penalty of perjury within 10 days of executing the plea agreement. The financial statement shall disclose to the USAO all assets and financial interests valued at more than $1,000. Defendant understands these assets and financial interests include all assets and financial interests that defendant has an interest, direct or indirect, whether held in defendant's name or in the name of another, in any property, real or personal. Defendant shall also identify all assets valued at more than $1,000 which Defendant has transferred to third parties or diverted from defendant, directly to third parties, since September 25, 2018, including the location of the assets and the identity of any third party.

v. The defendant admits the property and the in personam criminal forfeiture money judgment are (1) any property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), a specified unlawful activity as defined in 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(c)(7)(A) and 1961(1)(D), or 21 U.S.C. § 846, conspiracy to commit such offense; (2) any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as the result of violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846; (3) any property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit, or to facilitate the commission of violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846; and (4) all moneys, negotiable instruments, securities, or other things of value furnished or intended to be furnished in exchange for a controlled substance or listed chemical in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, all proceeds traceable to such an exchange, and all moneys, negotiable instruments, and securities used or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and are subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) with 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c); 21 U.S.C. § 853(a)(1); 21 U.S.C. § 853(a)(2); 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) with 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c); and 21 U.S.C. § 853(p).

5. Each party acknowledges and warrants that its execution of the Stipulation is free and is voluntary.

6. The Stipulation contains the entire agreement between the parties.

7. Except as expressly stated in the Stipulation, no party, officer, agent, employee, representative, or attorney has made any statement or representation to any other party, person, or entity regarding any fact relied upon in entering into the Stipulation, and no party, officer, agent, employee, representative, or attorney relies on such statement or representation in executing the Stipulation.

8. The persons signing the Stipulation warrant and represent that they have full authority to execute the Stipulation and to bind the persons and/or entities, on whose behalf they are signing, to the terms of the Stipulation.

9. This Stipulation shall be construed and interpreted according to federal forfeiture law and federal common law. The jurisdiction and the venue for any dispute related to, and/or arising from, this Stipulation is the unofficial Southern Division of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, located in Las Vegas, Nevada.

10. Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys' fees, expenses, interest, and costs.

11. This Stipulation shall not be construed more strictly against one party than against the other merely by virtue of the fact that it may have been prepared primarily by counsel for one of the parties; it being recognized that both parties have contributed substantially and materially to the preparation of this Stipulation.

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465(a)(2), that there was reasonable cause for the seizure and forfeiture of the property.

DATED: 12/19/19 DATED: January 10, 2020 NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH United States Attorney ________ ________ PAUL RIDDLE KEVIN D. SCHIFF Counsel for Jose Antonio Lopez-Verdugo Assistant United States Attorney DATED: 12/19/19 ________ Jose Antonio Lopez-Verdugo

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer