Elwell v. Harvey, 2:19-cv-01673-APG-NJK. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20200211e72
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2020
Summary: Order [Docket No. 22] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend deadlines by 60 days. Docket No. 22. As with the previously-granted stipulation, the instant request is again premised on the need to schedule Plaintiff's deposition, the need to schedule Plaintiff's IME, and the need for Defendant to obtain authorizations. Compare Docket No. 19 at 3-4 with Docket No. 22 at 4. The only explanation provided for this on-going need is that "Plaint
Summary: Order [Docket No. 22] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend deadlines by 60 days. Docket No. 22. As with the previously-granted stipulation, the instant request is again premised on the need to schedule Plaintiff's deposition, the need to schedule Plaintiff's IME, and the need for Defendant to obtain authorizations. Compare Docket No. 19 at 3-4 with Docket No. 22 at 4. The only explanation provided for this on-going need is that "Plainti..
More
Order
[Docket No. 22]
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend deadlines by 60 days. Docket No. 22. As with the previously-granted stipulation, the instant request is again premised on the need to schedule Plaintiff's deposition, the need to schedule Plaintiff's IME, and the need for Defendant to obtain authorizations. Compare Docket No. 19 at 3-4 with Docket No. 22 at 4. The only explanation provided for this on-going need is that "Plaintiff's counsel has been unable to contact Plaintiff." Docket No. 22 at 4.
The Court hereby SETS a hearing on the instant stipulation for 11:30 a.m. on February 18, 2020, in Courtroom 3C. PLAINTIFF HIMSELF MUST PERSONALLY APPEAR AT THE HEARING. Plaintiff's counsel must immediately provide Plaintiff with notice of the issuance of this order and must file a proof of service by February 11, 2020. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS, UP TO AND INCLUDING CASE-DISPOSITIVE SANCTIONS.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
