Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Amie v. Kraft-Sussman Funeral Service, Inc, 2:18-cv-02131-GMN-VCF. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20200228h16 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2020
Summary: AMENDED ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is the Motion for Refund (ECF NO. 30). No opposition has been filed. Under LR 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney's fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion. On March 8, 2019, Plaintiff was ordered to post a $500 cost bond. (ECF NO. 13). Plaintiff posted the $500 cost bond. On D
More

AMENDED ORDER

Before the Court is the Motion for Refund (ECF NO. 30).

No opposition has been filed. Under LR 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney's fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion.

On March 8, 2019, Plaintiff was ordered to post a $500 cost bond. (ECF NO. 13). Plaintiff posted the $500 cost bond.

On December 23, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation and order to dismiss with prejudice. (ECF NO. 28). The court granted the stipulation and this matter is now closed. (ECF NO. 29).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Refund (ECF NO. 30) is GRANTED, and that the $500 cost bond plus accrued interest be released to Plaintiff.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer