Robins v. Gittere, 3:19-cv-00506-MMD-CLB. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20200312c41
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2020
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , Chief District Judge . In this closed habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. 2254, Petitioner has filed a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 13) and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 14). The Court has dismissed this action because it is untimely under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). The time to appeal has expired. Petitioner has given the Court no reason to reconsider its dismissal. Consequently, the Court denies the motions. It is therefore ordered
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , Chief District Judge . In this closed habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. 2254, Petitioner has filed a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 13) and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 14). The Court has dismissed this action because it is untimely under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). The time to appeal has expired. Petitioner has given the Court no reason to reconsider its dismissal. Consequently, the Court denies the motions. It is therefore ordered ..
More
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, Chief District Judge.
In this closed habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Petitioner has filed a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 13) and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 14). The Court has dismissed this action because it is untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). The time to appeal has expired. Petitioner has given the Court no reason to reconsider its dismissal. Consequently, the Court denies the motions.
It is therefore ordered that the motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 13) is denied.
It is further ordered that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 14) is denied.
Source: Leagle
