Formica v. De Leon Carter, 2:20-cv-00221-RFB-NJK. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20200320a00
Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2020
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 8) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' discovery plan. Docket No. 8. For the reasons stated below, the discovery plan is DENIED. The presumptively reasonable discovery period is 180 days, measured from the date of the first appearance of any defendant. Local Rule 26-1(b)(1). Here, Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on March 2, 2020, Docket No. 6; therefore, the discovery cut-off is measured from that date. If the partie
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 8) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' discovery plan. Docket No. 8. For the reasons stated below, the discovery plan is DENIED. The presumptively reasonable discovery period is 180 days, measured from the date of the first appearance of any defendant. Local Rule 26-1(b)(1). Here, Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on March 2, 2020, Docket No. 6; therefore, the discovery cut-off is measured from that date. If the parties..
More
ORDER
(Docket No. 8)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is the parties' discovery plan. Docket No. 8. For the reasons stated below, the discovery plan is DENIED.
The presumptively reasonable discovery period is 180 days, measured from the date of the first appearance of any defendant. Local Rule 26-1(b)(1). Here, Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on March 2, 2020, Docket No. 6; therefore, the discovery cut-off is measured from that date. If the parties seek deadlines beyond those specified in Local Rule 26-1(b)(1), their discovery plan must comply with Local Rule 26-1(a). The parties must file a new joint proposed discovery plan that complies in full with the Local Rules, no later than March 25, 2020.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
