Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Santos v. HBR Management, Inc., 2:20-cv-00480-KJD-EJY. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20200320a02 Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2020
Summary: ORDER ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is the Stipulation and Order (ECF No. 7) seeking a 90 day stay of discovery and all deadlines to allow Plaintiff to complete his U.S. Marine Corps Recruit Training. However, to date, the parties have not filed a discovery plan and scheduling order. Therefore, there are no dates to stay or extend. The parties also do not provide the date on which Plaintiff's "recruit training" started or when it will end. Accordingly, IT IS HERE
More

ORDER

Before the Court is the Stipulation and Order (ECF No. 7) seeking a 90 day stay of discovery and all deadlines to allow Plaintiff to complete his U.S. Marine Corps Recruit Training. However, to date, the parties have not filed a discovery plan and scheduling order. Therefore, there are no dates to stay or extend. The parties also do not provide the date on which Plaintiff's "recruit training" started or when it will end.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation and Order (ECF No. 7) is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a revised stipulation. The revised stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order shall identify the start and end date of Plaintiff's training; a date for initial disclosures; a discovery period commencement date that is ten (10) calendar days after Plaintiff's anticipated completion of training; and, a close of discovery date that is 180 days thereafter. All other dates are to be included and are to flow therefrom.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer