U.S. v. FAISON, 10-CR-674(S-2)(DRH). (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. New York
Number: infdco20120127l24
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENIS R. HURLEY, Senior District Judge. Defendant's motions for a judgment of acquittal or, alternatively, for a new trial, as well as his motion for an arrest of judgment, brought pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 29, 33 and 34 respectively, are denied. Accordingly the government and the defendant are directed to be ready to proceed to sentence at the time and on the date previously scheduled, to wit 10:30 a.m. on February 1, 2012. As will be explained by t
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENIS R. HURLEY, Senior District Judge. Defendant's motions for a judgment of acquittal or, alternatively, for a new trial, as well as his motion for an arrest of judgment, brought pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 29, 33 and 34 respectively, are denied. Accordingly the government and the defendant are directed to be ready to proceed to sentence at the time and on the date previously scheduled, to wit 10:30 a.m. on February 1, 2012. As will be explained by th..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DENIS R. HURLEY, Senior District Judge.
Defendant's motions for a judgment of acquittal or, alternatively, for a new trial, as well as his motion for an arrest of judgment, brought pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 29, 33 and 34 respectively, are denied. Accordingly the government and the defendant are directed to be ready to proceed to sentence at the time and on the date previously scheduled, to wit 10:30 a.m. on February 1, 2012.
As will be explained by the Court immediately prior to the imposition of sentence, each of the motions is timed barred and, in any event, lacks merit.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
