LAUTMAN v. NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS, P.A., 13-CV-967 (ARR) (VVP). (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. New York
Number: infdco20140731i49
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 22, 2014
Summary: OPINION & ORDER ALLYNE R. ROSS, District Judge. I have reviewed plaintiff's objections to Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's order of June 25, 2014, see Dkt. #57, which was made on the record. Neither Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's denial of plaintiff's request that the magistrate recuse himself from plaintiff's case nor Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's setting of a discovery schedule against plaintiff's wishes after plaintiff asked to be excused was "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Fed. R. C
Summary: OPINION & ORDER ALLYNE R. ROSS, District Judge. I have reviewed plaintiff's objections to Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's order of June 25, 2014, see Dkt. #57, which was made on the record. Neither Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's denial of plaintiff's request that the magistrate recuse himself from plaintiff's case nor Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's setting of a discovery schedule against plaintiff's wishes after plaintiff asked to be excused was "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Fed. R. Ci..
More
OPINION & ORDER
ALLYNE R. ROSS, District Judge.
I have reviewed plaintiff's objections to Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's order of June 25, 2014, see Dkt. #57, which was made on the record. Neither Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's denial of plaintiff's request that the magistrate recuse himself from plaintiff's case nor Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's setting of a discovery schedule against plaintiff's wishes after plaintiff asked to be excused was "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Accordingly, plaintiff's request that the orders be set aside is denied.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
