U.S. v. KONOPKA, CR 13-0159. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. New York
Number: infdco20140904c66
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER LEONARD D. WEXLER, District Judge. The Court is in receipt of the letter filed by Defendant's accountant, Edwin J. Murphy, dated August 26, 2014, in which Mr. Murphy requests the Court's assistance with respect to problems encountered with the Internal Revenue Service in connection with Defendant's payments made pursuant to the Court's Judgment entered on November 1, 2013 in the amount of $90,670.77. The Court declines to address Mr. Murphy's letter as it is not the proper way to bring
Summary: ORDER LEONARD D. WEXLER, District Judge. The Court is in receipt of the letter filed by Defendant's accountant, Edwin J. Murphy, dated August 26, 2014, in which Mr. Murphy requests the Court's assistance with respect to problems encountered with the Internal Revenue Service in connection with Defendant's payments made pursuant to the Court's Judgment entered on November 1, 2013 in the amount of $90,670.77. The Court declines to address Mr. Murphy's letter as it is not the proper way to bring t..
More
ORDER
LEONARD D. WEXLER, District Judge.
The Court is in receipt of the letter filed by Defendant's accountant, Edwin J. Murphy, dated August 26, 2014, in which Mr. Murphy requests the Court's assistance with respect to problems encountered with the Internal Revenue Service in connection with Defendant's payments made pursuant to the Court's Judgment entered on November 1, 2013 in the amount of $90,670.77.
The Court declines to address Mr. Murphy's letter as it is not the proper way to bring the issue to the Court's attention. If the Defendant seeks to compel compliance by the IRS, he may bring an action against it for the relief he seeks. Moreover, any communications with the Court should be through Defendant's counsel or by the Defendant himself, not his accountant.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
