TRUSTEES OF THE PAVERS AND ROAD BUILDERS DISTRICT COUNCIL WELFARE, PENSION, ANNUITY AND APPRENTICESHIP, SKILL IMPROVEMENT AND SAFETY FUNDS v. ARBOR CONCRETE CORP., 15-CV-2481 (FB) (RML). (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. New York
Number: infdco20160106c60
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FREDERIC BLOCK , Senior District Judge . On December 15, 2015, Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that a default judgment be entered against Arbor Concrete Corp., and that Plaintiffs be awarded $37,204.06 in damages, fees, and costs, plus interest on the award of unpaid contribution and liquidated damages in an amount equal to that interest. The R&R further provided that failure to object within fourteen days would p
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FREDERIC BLOCK , Senior District Judge . On December 15, 2015, Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that a default judgment be entered against Arbor Concrete Corp., and that Plaintiffs be awarded $37,204.06 in damages, fees, and costs, plus interest on the award of unpaid contribution and liquidated damages in an amount equal to that interest. The R&R further provided that failure to object within fourteen days would pr..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FREDERIC BLOCK, Senior District Judge.
On December 15, 2015, Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that a default judgment be entered against Arbor Concrete Corp., and that Plaintiffs be awarded $37,204.06 in damages, fees, and costs, plus interest on the award of unpaid contribution and liquidated damages in an amount equal to that interest. The R&R further provided that failure to object within fourteen days would preclude appellate review. To date, no objections have been filed.
If clear notice has been given of the consequences of the failure to object, and there are no objections, the Court may adopt the R&R without de novo review. See Mario v. P & C Food Mkts., Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002) ("Where parties receive clear notice of the consequences, failure to timely object to a magistrate's report and recommendation operates as a waiver of further judicial review of the magistrate's decision."). The Court will excuse a failure to object and conduct de novo review if it appears that the magistrate judge may have committed plain error. See Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F.3d 162, 174 (2d Cir. 2000). No such error appears here. Accordingly, the Court adopts the R&R without de novo review and directs the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment in accordance with the R&R.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
