Filed: Sep. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2017
Summary: ORDER JOAN M. AZRACK , District Judge . Before the Court are objections submitted by defendants to Magistrate Judge Shields's August 14, 2017 Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). The R&R recommended that the Court deny in part and grant in part defendants' motions to dismiss. Having conducted a review of the full record and the applicable law, for the following reasons, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. In reviewing a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court must "mak
Summary: ORDER JOAN M. AZRACK , District Judge . Before the Court are objections submitted by defendants to Magistrate Judge Shields's August 14, 2017 Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). The R&R recommended that the Court deny in part and grant in part defendants' motions to dismiss. Having conducted a review of the full record and the applicable law, for the following reasons, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. In reviewing a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court must "make..
More
ORDER
JOAN M. AZRACK, District Judge.
Before the Court are objections submitted by defendants to Magistrate Judge Shields's August 14, 2017 Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). The R&R recommended that the Court deny in part and grant in part defendants' motions to dismiss. Having conducted a review of the full record and the applicable law, for the following reasons, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety.
In reviewing a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court must "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or . . . recommendations to which objection[s][are] made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Brown v. Ebert, No. 05-CV-5579, 2006 WL 3851152, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2006). The court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Those portions of the Report to which there is no specific reasoned objection are reviewed for clear error. See Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc., 249 F.R.D. 48, 51 (E.D.N.Y. 2008).
After considering all of defendants' objections de novo,1 the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety, and grants in part and denies in part defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint.
SO ORDERED.
